Well there is another problem. Using client billing makes the monthly cost even more expensive for the client. This is a problem I deal with every time. I am based in Sweden. Every now and then I deal with the problem that the hosting at Webflow is in many situations far more expense than traditional web hosting. Many time I have to really defend this extra cost and to make them move from one web hosting to Webflow and on top of that pay more per month. And if they don’t do that they will miss the CMS option. That can make a bit a problem sometimes. Doing like your suggestion will add on even more cost. For a large customer that would not be a problem at all, but for small…Just my opinion.