Yes this site i know But i didn´t know if it is a serious site. Thank you There stand 88,96 percent. So 11 percent can not use the website. This is too much. Is there an alternative for the older browser?
That resource is referenced by companies like IBM, Microsoft, Google, Mozilla, and more. It is authoritative.
You can choose to use the display properties that match up with the level of browser support you need. Flex has pretty good support, but does have IE issues. Block is supported 100%.
I can’t answer that question for you. On most of the sites I build, using CSS Grid is acceptable. When it is not, I use flex box. If that is not acceptable, then I code the sites by hand.
You should look at your analytics data to determine what the actual percentage is in your target geography, and if those visitors are already engaging your site. This is all the part of site discovery / research process when deciding on what technologies you will support.
As long as there is not a warning triangle in the Webflow designer I would assume they use a polyfill for the browsers that don’t support stuff like CSS grid. I haven’t been able to find any information confirming this though, could someone from Webflow confirm?
Thank you for your answer!
I wasn’t really considering IE and grid specifically, even if that was the original question… But generally speaking, if there is something that is lacking support in browsers, do we get either a heads up in the Webflow designer or do you use polyfills, or do we have to keep track of what’s supported ourselves? If the latter is the case, I would suggest the correct terms are used in the designer, so people are able to google it. For example, under Display Flex you can choose the Direction, but it’s called Horizontal and Vertical instead of Row and Column (why is that btw?).